Counsel uses INC Forensic's evidence-based methodology to surface the contradictions, gaps, and causal pathways that live between documents — across providers, time, and modalities — sourced and ready for the retained expert.
Five deliverables, scaled to what counsel needs.
A clinical timeline of the medical record, source-cited and organized by domain. The foundation a retained expert builds from.
Connects the dots across causation, medical necessity, mitigation, and differential diagnosis — organized analytical material the retained expert uses to form independent clinical opinions.
Medical Evidence Analytics. Surfaces patterns, relationships, and inconsistencies across the entire record corpus for counsel's review — used for case strategy and witness preparation.
Multi-modal TBI diagnostic testing — cognitive, limbic, autonomic, visuomotor, vestibular. Integrated domain testing with intrasubject design and statistical analytics. Engaged through INC's clinical network.
Direct polytrauma consultation. Neither treater nor testifying expert — a consultant who guides counsel through the pathways and data tracks of complex cases. Includes Glassbox data extraction with statistical analytics and graphical exhibits.
In development MedSight second-read advanced imaging analysis.
Where the record is dense, the timeline is contested, and the diagnostics span multiple specialties.
Counsel isn't the only audience for network-level analysis. Clinicians use INC too. It supports clinical judgment; it never replaces it. INC surfaces documentation gaps, missed correlations, and weak points. The clinician weighs each through their own reasoning and decides what, if anything, to do about it.
INC surfaces gaps, unsupported claims, and timeline inconsistencies opposing counsel could later exploit. The clinician reviews each flag through their own clinical reasoning and decides whether and how to address it.
INC surfaces where the documented record diverges from the intended course of care, the kind of gap that invites a challenge at deposition. Whether a divergence matters, and what to do about it, is the clinician's call.
Before a report is produced, INC pressure-tests it against the underlying record so nothing gets contradicted on cross. INC surfaces; the expert decides. Every clinical opinion remains the expert's own.
A documented four-stage workflow. Same inputs, same methodology, same outcome — every time.
An evidence-based analytical methodology grounded in peer-reviewed clinical and forensic literature. MEA deciphers the validity of the arguments — the patterns, the relationships, the inconsistencies that decide complex cases.
How findings evolve across the full treatment arc — surfacing patterns that span years that no single encounter reveals.
How the injury developed and was documented — and the moments where the record diverges from the claimed timeline.
Conflicting evidence, questionable treatment choices, documentation gaps. Errors and weaknesses identified prior to depositions and cross-examinations.
INC reads the record all at once — as one connected system, not a stack of documents.
A single case may engage INC from any seat — and the analysis returned is the same. What surfaces are the facts in the record and the relationships between them. The conclusions drawn from those facts, and the strategy built on them, belong to the engaging party.
Methodology grounded in peer-reviewed clinical and forensic literature, built to the Daubert and FRE 702/703 standard for expert evidence.
Same record, same methodology, same conclusions — every time. A contained, proprietary system, not a general-purpose LLM.
Every claim cites the underlying record page and the supporting references. Nothing in the analysis lives without a source.
A tool used by qualified experts. It does not testify. It does not diagnose. It supports the expert who does.
The same structural reading regardless of who engages it. Counsel determines how the analysis applies to the case.
INC Forensic analyzes evidence the way opposing counsel will — examining how findings connect across the entire record to identify vulnerabilities before they become liabilities.
INC surfaces conflicting evidence, poor logic, documentation gaps, errors, and case weaknesses for counsel — early, prior to depositions and cross-examinations. An early understanding of the injury terrain is essential to strong case management and rehabilitation.